Comments on: Tech Talk – The Technology Behind Noise Reduction https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/ Photo Editing Software | Discover AI-Powered Raw Photo Editor - ON1 Mon, 18 Mar 2024 20:57:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: Stu Eddins https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/#comment-61633 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:29:32 +0000 https://www.on1.com/?p=2239574#comment-61633 In reply to Ken Smith.

If you are using PhotoRAW and not just the plugin: “The new NoNoise AI 2024 enhancements and features will also be fully integrated inside Photo RAW 2024, coming in the next update for subscribers and owners of version 2024.”

]]> By: Anthony Bacon https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/#comment-61632 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:34:37 +0000 https://www.on1.com/?p=2239574#comment-61632 Looking back through my ON1 ownership, I am pleased to have adopted the subscription model. It has enabled me to stay up-to-date with developments for a trivial monthly cost that has totalled less than it would have cost to buy all the new releases.

I’m looking forwards to testing NNAI2024. I agree with Roger Seidule, the 62MPx images from my Sony a7rIVa are poorly treated by Tack Sharp, to the extent that I don’t use it. I’m hoping for better with this release.

My current workflow is to have the raw (ARW) files opened in NNAI2023 and saved as DNG files to automatically open in ACR for much of my processing, before handing over to PS (sorry ON1 guys, I use ON1PR for effects not basic PP). It irks that I can’t use the same automated workflow for single images. Come on, ON1, make it so, please.

]]> By: Anthony Bacon https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/#comment-61631 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:24:11 +0000 https://www.on1.com/?p=2239574#comment-61631 In reply to Emiliano.

Replying to Emiliano, there is AI and AI.

There is AI processing which uses only data from within the image; that power is increasing used in a number of tools in most post-processing software, to the extent that banning such AI from competition images will prevent much post-processing.

Then there is AI which introduces data from outside the image. That is generally and very understandably not acceptable in competitions.

I fear, though, that developers use the term “AI” when they mean “advanced programming techniques” and it’s really a marketing gimmick.

]]> By: Daniel Hagmann https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/#comment-61629 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 02:55:44 +0000 https://www.on1.com/?p=2239574#comment-61629 The current version of NoNoise performs very well and I do not need a third party software. Having Local NoNoise capabilities would be great in a future release. I am very happy with ON1 2024.1 with its richt set of integrated features in one compelling user friendly application.

]]> By: Ken Smith https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/#comment-61628 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 02:00:12 +0000 https://www.on1.com/?p=2239574#comment-61628 I’m disappointed that this iteration of NoNoise AI is a (substantial) extra charge.
On the other hand this gives me the opportunity to review other software packages.
Having been a user since 2019, before ordering ON1 2024 I was toying with the Adobe package for photographers for about the same price. This “extra”, NoNoise 2024 may be the tipping point. Photoshop has generative fill a form of AI, We’ll see what Adobe Lightroom has to offer.

]]> By: Patrick Smith https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/#comment-61626 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:50:12 +0000 https://www.on1.com/?p=2239574#comment-61626 In reply to Jack Melnikoff.

The system requirements for hardware will remain the same. You wont have to upgrade hardware to run this product.

]]> By: Jack Melnikoff https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/#comment-61625 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:46:04 +0000 https://www.on1.com/?p=2239574#comment-61625 In reply to Brian Lowe.

I respectfully disagree with accepting slower processing speeds. I’m concerned many of us will have to purchase hardware upgrades just so we can use this capability. Why would anyone upgrade for about $50 on this capability just so they can now spend several thousands of dollars to ensure they can even run it. Makes absolutely no sense. There needs to be a middle ground between performance and capability. I would think most users cannot be upgrading their hardware every time ON1 comes out with an upgrade.

]]> By: Patrick Smith https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/#comment-61624 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:41:25 +0000 https://www.on1.com/?p=2239574#comment-61624 In reply to Gerald Bixman.

You can view the press release here and under the price and availability section it will help explain things.
https://www.on1.com/blog/maximize-image-quality-new-on1-nonoise-ai-2024-is-coming/

]]> By: Gerald Bixman https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/#comment-61623 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:37:39 +0000 https://www.on1.com/?p=2239574#comment-61623 In reply to dgmurray.

What link are you talking about this is very confusing

]]> By: Richard Geiger https://www.on1.com/blog/tech-talk-the-technology-behind-noise-reduction/#comment-61620 Tue, 27 Feb 2024 20:51:43 +0000 https://www.on1.com/?p=2239574#comment-61620 I notice nothing is said about using NoNoise AI 2024 for portrait photography, specifically images taken within a few feet or yards of the subject.

]]>